Nandcc's Word List

Comment on Leave the Kids Alone: 'Tonight Show' Seats Crude Sarah Palin Hater Next to Her Daughter by capnjack

This man has the mentality of a 10-year old. A little man who would run like a scared rabbet if confrounted.

And we're just about ready!

As I planned out in my fuzzy brain, I used a router to cut a rabbet into the end of the hull where the transom will get glued and glassed in.  I was able to get the router bit inside … Continue reading →

Comment on by peterradclyffe23757

7 I decided to pattern & build all the centreline structure myself, I couldn’t trust the poles to do it & I couldn’t waste time, so I made the stem, gripe, keel, sternpost, deadwoods, horn timber or fish spine in italy,& teak counter block, one of the poles comprehensively vodka screwed up the keel rabbet, you have to give them a chance but after that I knew I couldn’t trust them on the centreline, 28 easier to do it myself & design, pattern, construct, bore & align the rudder , A-bracket & propshafts on this yacht & the big class, a busy few months , when they started planking they were rushing things & getting the plank runs unfair even tho’ I’d lined out the planks fairly, marked butts etc, 29 so I took them to one side & told them, don’t worry about how long it takes to get the line fair, get it fair, I don’t care if it takes you 3 days to put one plank in, I knew they’d get up to speed, just get it done right once, & for all I care you can throw your wristwatches away, don’t worry about time, I knew these guys had been in the polish military & they were solid workers, 30 unlike a lot of the guys in the yard, the chief failing of whom was their ability to yap endlessly, shoot the breeze, as thick as 2 short butt straps & incapable of understanding the difference between talk & work, but these poles were great guys, only once in 3 years did I say to them: get back to work, your coffee breaks over: they were earning 3 times what they’d earn in Poland, they had apartments paid for them here & every 4 months would go back home for 2 or 3 weeks at a time, but of all my teams in the yard they were the best, I could teach them what else they needed to know, __________________

6        I decided to pattern &  build all the centreline structure myself, I couldn’t trust the poles to do it & I couldn’t waste time, so I made  the stem, gripe, keel, sternpost, deadwoods, horn timber or fish spine in italy,& teak counter block, one of the poles comprehensively vodka screwed up the keel rabbet, [...]

Comment on Why placing the computer in the living room doesn’t work by Bob

I am lucky enough to have a x-bedroom/computer room in my home. Across the street, are my 5 Grandkids. Three teenage boys, 6 & 4 age girls. I Have side by side 24" screens. One for me, and one for them to learn on. No P-orn__no beheading war games. When I am working on mine, they can work on their's. For the boys: Homework, U-tube, music downloads. For the Girls: learn to read/type, Google, and Reader Rabbet stuff.

Cheap Milwaukee 48-23-6401 1-1/4 by 2-Inch Rabbeting Router Bit with 1/4-Inch Shank best buy price sale

Cheap Milwaukee 48-23-6401 1-1/4 by 2-Inch Rabbeting Router Bit with 1/4-Inch Shank best buy price sale:

Features:
Creates smooth, precise cuts on both surfaces of rabbet
Bit cuts 3/8 in. rabbets
Read More Review..

Comment on Little tall rabbet and the watchful Indians by rose marsh

HI George, I found your photos by browsing for Gozo photographers and I really love your style of photography. This might be a slightly odd request but I'm trying to find a photographer for my wedding in Qala next year but so far I haven't seen anything as good as your stuff by going to the official wedding photography sites. Any chance you would consider doing something like this (we are having something really relaxed and you would have creative licence)? If you're interested then drop me an email. Thanks Rose

Little tall rabbet and the watchful Indians

joined chest floor boards & more

It doesn’t seem it lately, but I do still make furniture. Today I managed to shoot a couple of ordinary-quality pictures of the floor of a joined chest I have underway in the shop. This chest is a copy of the ones made in Braintree, Massachusetts c. 1640-1700 by William Savell and his sons John [...]

Wise Rabbet's quote of the year...

Eli over at Rabbet Run brilliantly sums up the emerging consensus: Before we worried if climate change was loading the dice, now we have to start thinking about whether climate change is loading the gun Listen to Rabbet.

Comment on Conflicted Reviewers Distort Literature by VS

Agreed. Climate scientists should understand that in order to assail a statistical method you need to wave some convergence theorems and matrices, not vague conjectures and the apparently popular term 'dicking around' (so far, I've seen both Joshua Halpern/Rabbet and James Annan use it to discredit a statistical method they fail to grasp). ----------------- Also, repost of my comment from James Annan's blog. ----------------- Annan, I took a quick look at the Knappenberger presentation you linked to, and as far as I can tell, the conclusions broadly coincide with those of MM10. In summary: the models have a tendency to overestimate the warming trend. Having said that, I'm not impressed with the 'statistical power' of the setup employed there. Then again, it's not really a formally derived test, so speaking about power/size doesn't make much sense in this context. With all due respect, I don't understand why everybody got so 'excited' about it. The nice thing about the MMH paper, which *is* a formal test, is that it allows for correlations between the distribution of the trend estimators. This greatly improves the power of the test employed, which is a *must* given the enormous cross-dependencies and short time-interval available. And given the reactions here I feel the need to point out the obvious: this method for a large part deals with the problem of inter-series dependency. Note that the naive 'hypothesis test' presented by Knappenberger in essence fails to do this. Also note that failing to account for the *positive* correlation between the trend point estimates *will* widen the confidence interval for parameter difference, leading to severe statistical power reductions in your test. People should brush up on their stats, and then proceed to thank MMH for addressing this issue. Jeez. Best, VS PS. I resent your 'dicking around' comment on statistical hypothesis testing, as should any positivist scientist. You guys would really benefit from some gravity, especially given that your methods fail to predict even the direction of temperature change correctly.

The selfish smiling fool,& the sullen, frowning fool shall be thought wise, that they may be a rod. What is now proved was only once imagin'd. The rat, the mouse, the fox, the rabbet watch the roots; the lion the tyger, the horse, the elephant, watch the fruits. The cistern contains: the fountain overflows. One thought fills immensity, always be ready to speak your mind, and a base man will avoid you. Every thing possible to be beliv'd is an image of truth. The eagle never lost so much time, as when he submitted to learn of the crow.

yes, i’ve actually bought a copy of men’s health, which is pretty strange for one like me but i just had to. and it’s not about trying to get into womans bed (which is pretty easy) like in the article on the front; it’s about training scheme, and diet. so i’ve taken the magazine to [...]

Heh. Climate Math

Definitely an “in joke.” From ClimateAudit: Gavin explained his frustration stemmed from people asking the same question over and over when it was already answered. He then reveals something new and closes the thread. We carry on here with one unknown guy trying to defend mann. That’s the PROBLEM. Mann: 2+2=5 McIntyre No, 2+2=4 Mann; [...]

Comment on Mosher: Who’s on first? by Steven mosher

Mann: 2+2=5 McIntyre: No, 2+2=4 Mann: thats bizarre Mc: 2+2=4, just say it Mike Mann: it doesnt matter, look over here we say 3+3=6 Mc: 2+2=4 Mann: it doesnt matter, ask gavin Amac: ya 2+2=4 Mann: it doesnt matter Mosher: Can anybody besides steve just say that 2+2=4 Dehog: You said Piltdown Mann once. Mc: 2+2=4 Gavin: it doesnt matter: Tiljander: 2+2=4 Arthur Smith: I”ll look into it. Amac; 2+2=4 Gavin: Can we change the subject, we said it doesnt matter. Mosher: can you say 2+2=4 Lambert: Fuller is full of it. Bishop: Mike said 2+2=5, but 2+2=4 Tamino: Bishop said 2+2=5 Mc: Bishop was explaining Mann. Amac: 2+2=4 Kloor: why can’t we reason together? Gavin: we try, but they wont read our answers. Amac: 2+2=4 Gavin: There he goes again, please shut him up. Mc; 2+2=4 RC commenter: Do your own science Mcintyre Mc: 2+2=4 is not publishable. Mann needs to correct this. Mann: its all in the SI Amac: hey mann website now says 2+2=4 Gavin: The exact value of 2+2 is uninteresting. move along RC commenter: Hey McIntyre said 2+2=5 Mc: no I didnt RC commenter: oops, my bad, but I’m right in spirit Gavin: discussion over, lets talk about the black list. Kloor: all you people who think 2+2=4, can discuss this further. Scientist: Tiljander’s paper wasn’t perfect, lets pressure test her. Amac: but 2+2=4 Scientist: Can you give me a reading list? Bender: read the whole blog. Amac: in summary 2+2=4 Deltoid Commenter: tw pls tw eqls fr Lambert: You’ve been disemvoweled Amac: 2+2=4 Hank Roberts: I can’t find Amac on google scholar Jim Praul: Good I’ll put him on the list. Shell Oil: 2+2 =4 Deep Climate: that proves McIntyre’s Oil connection. Briffa: I got 2+2=3 Harry: I didnt write that code. Mann: Keith, hide that decline, here borrow 2 from me. Jones: Keith, we match Mann now 2+2=5 Obsborn: Somebody email Amman and see what he thinks. RyanO: good luck with that, Amman never answers mail Palmer: Perfect, ask him if our mail is confidential. Amman: Jones: I think Amman would agree,deny the FOIA Briffa (CONFIDENTIAL) gene, McItyre says 2+2=4. Can you help. Wahl: We replicated his work, 2+2=5 Holland: I heard that. Amac: 2+2=4 Amman: Oh MAN! will this crap ever end?? (http://eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=887) RyanO: Hey, how’d you get Amman to answer mail? YAD061: 2+2=5 (+-6sigma) Amac:2+2=4 Brian Angliss: Lots of mails you havent read might say 2+2=4 Santer: Amac, you and me in the alley. Dehog: Christy Believes in God. Spencer: wrong skeptic, dehog. God: 2+2=4 Jones: Dear God, delete your mail Overpeck: Keith we need something more compelling than the Hockey stick Briffa: 2+2=4.1? Overpeck: MORE compelling keith Wigley: McIntyre may have a point on this 2+2=4 thing. Mann: “Who knows what trickery has been pulled or selective use of data made.” Eli rabbet: Spencer made a mistake, therefore, 2+2=5 Amac: 2+2=4 Briffa: I got it, Peck, 2+2=5 Mann: I said that first. Gavin: In a massive waste of time and money Independent researchers have investigated this uninteresting thing. Moshpit:{ slaps forehead} Amman: http://www.naturesongs.com/cricket1.wav Shell Oil: Hulme we gave you 2 million last month and you want another 2 million? Hulme: Ya, 5 should be enough. Pachauri, promised us 6, so that makes 12. Shell oil: Who is your accountant? Hulme: Wei-Chyung Wang, at Suny Jones: He keeps great records ask Keenan. Amac: 2+2=4. Deltoid commenter: can I buy a vowel? Lambert: buy 2 get 2 free Mann: He doesnt need 5, Tim, sheesh. Judith Curry: can you boys please stop this nonsense Mann: They started it Mc: did not Gavin: did too Amac: did somebody say 2? 2+2=4

Comment on Mosher on Gavin’s “Frustration” by steven Mosher

Overpeck: Keith we need something more compelling than the Hockey stick Briffa: 2+2=4.1? Overpeck: MORE compelling keith Wigley: McIntyre may have a point on this 2+2=4 thing. Mann: "Who knows what trickery has been pulled or selective use of data made." Eli rabbet: Spencer made a mistake, therefore, 2+2=5 Amac: 2+2=4 Briffa: I got it, Peck, 2+2=5 Mann: I said that first. Gavin: In a massive waste of time and money Independent researchers have investigated this uninteresting thing. Moshpit: Amman: Shell Oil: Hulme we gave you 2 million last month and you want another 2 million? Hulme: Ya, 5 should be enough. Pachauri, promised us 6, so that makes 12. Shell oil: Who is your accountant? Hulme: Wei-Chyung Wang, at Suny Jones: He keeps great records ask Keenan. Amac:2+2=4. Deltoid commenter: can I buy a vowel? Lambert: buy 2 get 2 free Mann: He doesnt need 5, Tim. ok.. time for a little break.

Comment on VIDEO: Kitteh Plays Tetherball With Lamp Chain by poussinboi

Qwinss Rabbet Sprung Unyun T..

Comment on The No-Dendro Illusion by SOI

Scientist, You claim: "Also note, that the comments of ths study collectors are…useful…in thinking about how to use their data…but don’t rule out other interpretations." Ok, we've seen other people (including the mad rabbet) try this line of reasoning in the past to try rehabilitate Mann's upside down use of the proxy. One simple question: if Mann did knowingly do so, don't you think he had an obligation to explain (either in the paper or the SI) that he did so and why the interpretation of the study collector was correct?